[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "Smooth upgrade" for jadetex/xmltex: transitional packages?



Hi,

Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:

> But I'm not sure we really need and want that.  As far as I can tell,
> jadetex and xmltex are mainly used as build-depends.  If we just make
> sure that the source and binary packages disappear from the archive, it
> doesn't matter if some individual user still has the binary packages
> installed.  We could introduce a NEWS.Debian entry in texlive-common (or
> tl-latex-base, or even tex-common, something which everybody has
> installed) explaining what has been done.

I don't understand your goal. With your proposal, if I understand it
correctly, users who have installed jadetex or xmltex would be left with
the old packages until they remove them themselves, presumably after
having read a debconf note, right? So, basically, it's "upgrade works if
you do it manually, dude". I don't see the point...

What's the problem with uploading dummy jadetex and xmltex packages?
Synchronisation with TL?

-- 
Florent



Reply to: