[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Backport to etch

Hi all!

On Mon, 14 Mai 2007, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I believe that bpo.1 is the normal suffix.  Have a look at the
> backports repository for examples.

On Mon, 14 Mai 2007, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Should it go to <http://www.backports.org>? Then you must name ist
> 2007-7~bpo.1 The changelog entry looks good.

Ok, taking a look there I see that it should be 

But, many new quesions:
- Build-Dep on tex-common (>= 1.7)
	if I make a package tex-common 1.7~bpo.1 then I have to adjust
	all the build deps to get it right, this is stupid ...?
- Do we backport *all* packages?
	If yes, what to do with the temp tetex packages? Kill them so
	that people can continue to use both TeX systems?

Suggestions please ...

Best wishes


Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>                    Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org>                         Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
The suit into which the man's body had been stuffed looked
as if it's only purpose in life was to demonstrate how
difficult it was to get this sort of body into a suit.
                 --- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

Reply to: