Bug#345604: How to deal with teTeX's and texlive's RC licensing bugs
tags 345604 -etch-ignore
thanks
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 10:55:27AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> > Er, first of all, according to your last email we still have the following
> > two issues:
> [...]
> > These were designated "ignorable for etch", but that doesn't mean they
> > aren't problems, and nothing in your mail suggested that they are resolved.
> Yes, sorry, I missed these two.
> > Second, it's improper to close bugs in changelog entries for versions of a
> > package that don't actually fix those bugs.
> The next upload will contain a new orig.tar.gz, where the ones you
> identified as RC are removed. Plus one more you didn't notice, the
> GFDL'ed fontinstallationguide.pdf with incomplete source. This and at
> least the ConTeXt stuff relates to this bug.
Ok. FWIW, source for documentation is not an RC issue.
> > Anyway, setting the etch-ignore tag now.
> Thanks. Shouldn't this be delayed until the fixed package reaches etch?
> At least I wanted to ask for etch-ignore tags for the remaining
> licensing bugs as soon as that has happened.
Ah, I didn't understand that these fixes had yet to reach testing.
Unsetting the tag; please feel free to re-set it when you see that the
package is in testing.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: