Bug#345604: How to deal with teTeX's and texlive's RC licensing bugs
tags 345604 etch-ignore
thanks
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:51:51AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I've written earlier in this bug:
>
> ,----
> | Since we should really check other docs as well, I'm retitling this one,
> | and we'll keep it open until every document has been checked.
> `----
>
> However, since we're not going to finish the complete auditing (which
> covers TeX input files, not only documentation), I'm closing this in the
> next changelog entry.
Er, first of all, according to your last email we still have the following
two issues:
> > csname.txt: etch-ignore (due to blanket license statement?).
> Yes, it's part of AMSTeX which has a general license statement.
> > doc/encspecs/ and examples: etch-ignore.
These were designated "ignorable for etch", but that doesn't mean they
aren't problems, and nothing in your mail suggested that they are resolved.
Second, it's improper to close bugs in changelog entries for versions of a
package that don't actually fix those bugs.
Anyway, setting the etch-ignore tag now.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: