Re: How to deal with teTeX's and texlive's RC licensing bugs

[Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>]

On 28.09.06 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:

Hi,

> >> | dinbrief: lppl 1.1+, but with additional restrictions which are non-free
> >
> > Strange, I have in my dinbrief version in texlive:
> > %% It may be distributed under the terms of the LaTeX Project Public
> > %% License (LPPL), as described in lppl.txt in the base LaTeX distribution.
> > %% Either version 1.1 or, at your option, any later version.
> 
> Same here.  I can't figure out where I found the additional
> restrictions.  I've removed it from the wiki.
> 
Maybe it slipped in from older times. It was non-free in pre-teTeX
2.0.1 and was freed before 2.0.2. What does the CTAN catalogue
actually say?

H.
-- 
Hmmm ... an arrogant bouquet with a subtle suggestion of POLYVINYL
CHLORIDE ...
  http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/