Re: Possible regression in teTeX due to license problems: Please check whether your package is affected

[Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>]

Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> wrote:

> Hello!
>
> Please cc: me on reply, I'm not subscribed to the d-tex-maint list (I
> set M-F-T and R-T accordingly).
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:43:37 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Summary: 
>>
>> We will probably have to remove files from teTeX due to license
>> problems: Please check whether your package is affected!
> [...]
>> Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
>
> I'm not a Tex expert, so I'll probably need some help to sort this
> out.  Below the situation of my packages.
>
>>    parenscript
>
> This package suggests tetex-bin and tetex-extra if you want to have
> the documentation on different PDF files.  

I've checked the generated LaTeX code.  Except for the minor bug I just
reported, it is okay, and doesn't need any license-problematic files.

>>    qbook
>
> This one suggests tetex-bin if the end user wants to produce LaTeX
> documents instead of HTML one.  At least in this case I don't think
> there's a problem with the suggestion.

This one creates amazingly simple LaTeX code, no external files are
needed at all.  Consequently it's safe, too.

Thanks for contacting us,
Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)