Re: Bug#395270: requires mktexlsr from tetex-bin package
Hi all!
On Don, 26 Okt 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mit, 25 Okt 2006, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > else the package is uninstallable as it calls mktexlsr in .postinst
>
> Umpf, yes. Why the **** is tetex-bin depending on tetex-base and not the
> other way round ....
>
> Anyway, I guess I have to change all the alternative dependencies of
> texlive to tetex-bin instead of tetex-base.
>
> Is this ok???? teTeX Gurus please speak up?
>
> Currently you could install:
> texlive-pictures
> tetex-base
> without tetex-bin. Umpf.
Currently tpm2deb.pl has the following code:
# various texlive packages optionally depend on tetex:
# so we have to replace
# texlive-base -> texlive-base | tetex-base
# texlive-latex-base -> texlive-latex-base | tetex-base
if (!unversioned_tetex_conflict(@AllConflicts)) {
my @newdep = ();
foreach $d (@AllDepends) {
if ($d =~ m/^texlive-base$/) {
$o = "texlive-base | tetex-base";
} elsif ($d =~ m/^texlive-latex-base$/) {
$o = "texlive-latex-base | tetex-base";
} else {
$o = $d;
}
push @newdep, $o;
}
@AllDepends = @newdep;
}
I guess that should be the following:
Replacing
texlive-base
with
texlive-base | tetex-bin
and replacing
texlive-latex-base
with
texlive-latex-base | tetex-bin
Do you agree?
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLBATHIC (adj.)
Gifted with ability to manipulate taps using only the feet.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: