On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:44:48PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > > > As I said, we generally don't update single files in tetex, because > > it would simply be too much work - it would mean to maintain our > > own, Debian-specific TeX distribution. We do consider updating > > certain critical things, but for sure this requires that the > > upstream author says "you should *really* have this", and not just > > posts it somewhere in Usenet. > > > Is that a acceptable answer for you? Not really, but... > In texmf.cnf should be a local texmf tree be defined and you're free > to put the file in question into that one. You may even divert > seminar.bg2 if it is necessary. This is much more suitable. Thank you for explaining the package setup. > I suggest to tag that bug as wonfix and wait until the file made it > into upstream and the upstream release into Debian. If teTeX dies it > will happen in a TeX-Live release. Fine with me. So others can see the bug and an appropriate workaround. Thank you for looking into this gain. Bye, Joerg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature