Bug#348513: Segfault in Perl script
Joshua Lee <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> So the part with the missing file is nearly clear - at least I cannot
>> imagine how tetex could be responsible for it being deleted. But the
>> segfault should be investigated; I'm unsure whether I just should
>> reassign to perl - what do others think?
> This is really not an answer to that question, but perl-tk wasn't a
> required dependency of tetex-doc in sid. I added it to the apt-get line
> when I first got tetex-doc anyway - I figured I'd want it.
That's on purpose - the texdoctk script is in tetex-bin, and tetex-bin
Recommends perl-tk. A dependency would be too strict, since many people
will want to use tetex-bin without texdoctk. And similarly, many people
install tetex-doc but never use texdoctk.
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)