Re: [tex-live] Re: Proposal for a tex-base package
- To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
- Cc: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [tex-live] Re: Proposal for a tex-base package
- From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:38:12 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 871x5ejee3.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
- In-reply-to: <20050730075553.GE2968@preusse> (Hilmar Preusse's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:55:53 +0200")
- References: <20050517165550.GH419@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <87br784egh.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20050519095122.GG17017@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <87fywjcx2i.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20050610175229.GC24600@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20050730075553.GE2968@preusse>
Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
> On 10.06.05 Norbert Preining (preining@logic.at) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> % allow for compressed files, and various extenions
>> TEXDOCSSUFFIX = ;.pdf;.ps;.dvi;.html;.txt;.tex
>> TEXDOCSCOMPRESS = ;.gz;.bz2;.zip;.Z
>> TEXDOCEXT = {$TEXDOCSSUFFIX}{$TEXDOCSCOMPRESS}
>>
> In Debian we have:
>
[...]
> but this is really specific to Debian.
I lost the context, but isn't the whole variable Debian-specific? I
think I remember that TE declined to use texmf.cnf for this type of
customization, and therefore refused to accept (at least part of) the
patch against texdoc. Didn't check the sources, though.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: