Bug#269584: Error: `omega -ini -jobname=lambda -progname=lambda lambda.ini' failed
On 25.03.05 Guus Sliepen (guus@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
> I get this error when upgrading tetex-extra:
>
>From which version, to which one?
> This is Omega, Version 3.14159--1.23.2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5) (INIOMEGA)
> Copyright (c) 1994--2000 John Plaice and Yannis Haralambous
> [...]
> =================================
> Applying patch file ltpatch.ltx
> =================================
> (/usr/share/texmf/omega/lambda/omegabook/ltpatch.ltx)
>
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> !! Patch file `ltpatch.ltx' (for version <2001/06/01>)
> !! is not suitable for version <2003/12/01> of LaTeX.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> !! Please check if initex found an old patch file:
> !! --- if so, rename it or delete it, and redo the
> !! initex run.
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
What does kpsewhich latex.ltx tell you?
> So omega complains about ltpatch.ltx being outdated. Maybe this
> also caused the similar problems mentioned in #269584?
>
AFAICT 269584 has nothing to do with your problem.
> Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
> ii dpkg 1.13.0 Package maintenance system for Deb
> ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11-0.1 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
> ii tetex-base 2.99.7.20041225-beta-1 Basic library files of teTeX
> ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-26 The teTeX binary files
>
Hmm:
1. An upgrade of tetex-base should have upgraded the ltpatch.ltx too.
Although I must say, that the patch above is at a weird location. It
should sit in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/.
2. That version of tetex-base is quite old meanwhile. Newer versions
should conflict with tetex-bin < 2.99, as these version don't play
together.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: