Bug#287441: CVS frank tetex-bin: [experimental] splitting patchtargets to the new dsf-patch system
Hallo Hilmar,
teTeX CVS <jdg-tetex-cvs@debian.org> schrieb:
> Log message:
> [experimental] splitting patchtargets to the new dsf-patch system
And you wrote:
> Maybe that request is already obsolete due to Franks work on teTeX
> beta: I'd like to see a patch target in debian/rules to make sure
> debian/rules won't try to patch the tetex sources once again when
> calling "./debian/rules binary" a second time and the source was
> already patched.
I have implemented this in 2.99.9; however if there is a problem we
should also fix it in 2.0.2. It's just that I don't see the problem,
because we already have configure-stamp.
So in order to run into the problem you descirbe (double patching when
calling the binary target), it seems to me you must manually remove
configure-stamp, instead of either keeping it, or rather call clean. Why
do you need to remove it, and what do you gain by not doing it with
clean? I assumed that if one runs ./configure with changed options, just
about everything needs to be remaked, anyway.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: