Re: tex-common and TEXMFSYSCONFIG
On Die, 15 Nov 2005, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> > I cannot recall this decision, did we have a purpose for setting it this
> > way and not to TEXMFLOCAL?
>
> I don't remeber when this has been discussed. However, there has been
> some discussion on TEXMFSYSCONFIG and problems related to it recently.
> See http://lists.debian.org/debian-tetex-maint/2005/11/msg00112.html et al.
>
Done, answered, thanks.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-tetex-maint/2005/11/msg00414.html I found
> some interoperability problems between your lmodern packages and ConTeXt
> from teTeX 3.0. What's the situation like with TeX Live? Do you use the
> separate lmodern package? If yes, I would expect similar problems there,
> but the other way round.
TeXlive conflicts with lmodern and ships its own set of files. Until the
current lmodern package is updated and conformant with TeXlive, I will
not depend on it.
> difficult to use a separate lmodern package for both teTeX and TeX Live.
Sic.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HERSTMONCEUX (n.)
The correct name for the gold medallion worn by someone who is in the
habit of wearing their shirt open to the waist.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: