[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: tex-common and TEXMFSYSCONFIG



On Die, 15 Nov 2005, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> > I cannot recall this decision, did we have a purpose for setting it this
> > way and not to TEXMFLOCAL?
> 
> I don't remeber when this has been discussed. However, there has been
> some discussion on TEXMFSYSCONFIG and problems related to it recently.
> See http://lists.debian.org/debian-tetex-maint/2005/11/msg00112.html et al.
> 

Done, answered, thanks.

> http://lists.debian.org/debian-tetex-maint/2005/11/msg00414.html I found
> some interoperability problems between your lmodern packages and ConTeXt
> from teTeX 3.0. What's the situation like with TeX Live? Do you use the
> separate lmodern package? If yes, I would expect similar problems there,
> but the other way round.

TeXlive conflicts with lmodern and ships its own set of files. Until the
current lmodern package is updated and conformant with TeXlive, I will
not depend on it.

> difficult to use a separate lmodern package for both teTeX and TeX Live.

Sic.

Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at>             Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HERSTMONCEUX (n.)
The correct name for the gold medallion worn by someone who is in the
habit of wearing their shirt open to the waist.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff



Reply to: