[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#338608: Documenting change to tetex 3.0; deprecating initex and virtex.



From: Julian Gilbey <jdg@polya.uklinux.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#338608: Documenting change to tetex 3.0; deprecating initex and virtex.
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:24:40 +0000

> all.  In sarge, virtex was effectively a synonym for plain TeX.

Is this because fmt file for plain TeX is now called as 
tex.fmt (but not plain.fmt which was common in old days),
and virtex is a symbolic link to tex, and a current tex binary
uses a format file of the name it is called under?

I suspect these features are not documented in the TeXbook.

Regards,		     2005-11-14(Mon)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima



Reply to: