hi hilmar, On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:13:08PM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > Sorry for late response! no worries. this isn't exactly an earth shattering priority :) > For third party software we have a policy. If anybody is willing to > maintain the package as a separate one, please open an RfP or ITP bug > against wnpp. it seems kind of silly to have a single .sty (and accompanying .pdf documentation, maybe) file as an entirely seperate package. > 1. Make sure the license of the package is OK for Debian. I did not > download the package and checked it. Please do so! i did so before filing the bug report: % The author grants permission for anyone to use this macro package and % to distribute it unchanged without further restriction. If you choose % to modify this package, you must indicate that you have modified it % prior to your distributing it. I don't want to get bug reports about % changes that *you* have made! use/redistribution/modification are all covered. > 2. If you want to have it in teTeX upload it to CTAN. Normally we > forward these inclusing wishes to upstream (TE) and he normally > refuses to include package not in the contrib tree of CTAN. okay. maybe somebody with more motivation will do so :) sean --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature