Bug#329189: tetex-base: dvips -Poutline not using .pfb fonts
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 19:01 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
> Here is tetex-extra-apt.log
> ===========================
> Reading Package Lists...
> Building Dependency Tree...
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> tetex-extra
> 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0B/10.5MB of archives.
> After unpacking 40.1MB of additional disk space will be used.
> Selecting previously deselected package tetex-extra.
> (Reading database ... 57352 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking tetex-extra (from .../tetex-extra_2.0.2c-8_all.deb) ...
> Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2c-8) ...
>
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams with new version
>
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm with new version
>
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz with new version
>
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz with new version
> Running initex. This may take some time. ...
> Running updmap. This may take some time. ...
> using config file /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
> using output directory /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config
>
> Scanning for LW35 support files
>
> Scanning for MixedMap entries:
>
> Scanning for Map entries:
>
>
> Files generated in /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config:
I don't know the postinst scripts of the teTeX 2 packages all that well,
but I am wondering why there is no indication of update-updmap actually
running. Although update-updmap must have run at some point, otherwise a
manual updmap wouldn't have produced a correct map file.
cheerio
ralf
Reply to: