Re: SVN tetex commit: r150 and r151
On 27.09.05 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
> > On 26.09.05 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> >> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
Hi all,
> >> > in these two commits one ls-R file moved from tetex-base to
> >> > tex-common.
> >> >
> >> > 1. In tetex-base there is no changelog entry yet.
> >>
> >> Thanks for spotting this. Do you keep a list? Those changes where
> >> somewhen in August!
> >>
> > It hit me when I tried to upgrade to the latest teTeX 3.0 package
> > from experimental. Then I started looking at the SVN and found no
> > entry in the changelog although it was fixed.
>
> So you mean there actually is a problem?
>
Well, it was at the time when I tried to upgrade from something like
tetex-base 3.0-3 to the most recent one. I could not install the
latest tex-common together with the old version as both contain the
soft link /usr/share/texmf/ls-R.
> > I still don't understand when one have to use Conflicts and when
> > to use Replaces.
>
> I was thinking that we need nothing of that sort at all. If you
> encountered problems, we probably do.
>
To make it completely clean tex-common 0.7 should conflict with a
tetex-base still containing the link.
H.
--
Drunks are rarely amusing unless they know some good songs and lose a
lot a poker.
-- Karyl Roosevelt
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
Reply to: