Re: SVN tetex commit: r150 and r151
On 26.09.05 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
Hi all,
> > in these two commits one ls-R file moved from tetex-base to
> > tex-common.
> >
> > 1. In tetex-base there is no changelog entry yet.
>
> Thanks for spotting this. Do you keep a list? Those changes where
> somewhen in August!
>
It hit me when I tried to upgrade to the latest teTeX 3.0 package
from experimental. Then I started looking at the SVN and found no
entry in the changelog although it was fixed.
> > 2. The Conflicts- and Replaces-lines are not yet set accordingly.
>
> The actual files in /var/, as well as the symlink in
> /usr/local/share/texmf are created by maintainer scripts and not
> included in the deb, whereas /usr/share/texmf/ls-R still belongs to
> tetex-base. Why do you think that a Replaces is necessary?
>
I still don't understand when one have to use Conflicts and when to
use Replaces. One reason, why I did not apply to the New maintainers
process. ;-|
H.
--
Maj. Bloodnok: Seagoon, you're a coward!
Seagoon: Only in the holiday season.
Maj. Bloodnok: Ah, another Noel Coward!
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
Reply to: