On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:05:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > yeah, that sounds good. whether this should affect sarge for a > > point-release i think is worth pinging debian-release, i guess. > > > Is this really RC? Now that we know that the license statement inside > the files are wrong and they are really LPPL: > Can't we simply downgrade the bug to importand, change the > description to "license statement in the files of seminar package is > wrong" and then forward that bug to upstream (TE)? no complaints from me... sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature