hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:27:26PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > With the agreement of Timothy Van Zandt (now tvz@zandtwerk.kellogg.nwu.edu), > the distributions conditions on seminar are now relaxed to: > > This package may be distributed under the terms of the LaTeX Project Public > License, as described in lppl.txt in the base LaTeX distribution. > Either version 1.0 or, at your option, any later version. > > This overrides the conditions listed below. A new version of > "seminar" is in preparation by Timothy van Zandt. > > . And below we find the conditions you quoted. I'll contact Tim if > we can patch the files and replace the lines above by something like: > > "see sem-read.me.gz for copyright conditions" > > . Is that acceptable? teTeX 2.0 was released under 1.2 but AFAIK this > is OK for sarge. etch will have teTeX 3.0 and LPPL 1.3. The same > wording we still have in 3.0. yeah, that sounds good. whether this should affect sarge for a point-release i think is worth pinging debian-release, i guess. sean --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature