Bug#225004: marked as done (tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:08 +0200
with message-id <20050910141808.GD2928@preusse>
and subject line Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2003 13:46:45 +0000
>From porton@ex-code.com Wed Dec 24 07:46:45 2003
Return-path: <porton@ex-code.com>
Received: from ns4.raid.ru (smtp.raid.ru) [212.33.224.131]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AZ9Iy-0003iY-00; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 07:44:04 -0600
Received: from [212.33.240.167] (helo=porton.narod.ru)
by smtp.raid.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1AZ9It-0007Oe-00; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:44:00 +0500
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=home.porton.narod.ru ident=porton)
by porton.narod.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 1AZ2X9-0000HY-00; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:30:15 +0500
Content-Length: 295
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.3 on Linux
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:30:14 +0500 (YEKT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.48
From: Victor Porton <porton@ex-code.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package
Bcc:
Message-Id: <E1AZ2X9-0000HY-00@porton.narod.ru>
Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com)
X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0-10
Severity: wishlist
Type1 fonts (together with corresponding .afm files) contained in this
package (such as "eufm" font) should be in a separate package
(tetex-extra-fonts?).
They are needed independingly of TeX (e.g. for math on the Web in MathML
format).
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225004-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2005 14:18:42 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Sat Sep 10 07:18:42 2005
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EE6Bm-0007dI-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 07:18:42 -0700
Received: from [213.6.172.177] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #314)
id 1EE6BG-0007be-00
for 225004-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:11 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:08 +0200
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:08 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 225004-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package
Message-ID: <20050910141808.GD2928@preusse>
References: <E1AZ2X9-0000HY-00@porton.narod.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1AZ2X9-0000HY-00@porton.narod.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 225004-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On 24.12.03 Victor Porton (porton@ex-code.com) wrote:
Hi,
> Type1 fonts (together with corresponding .afm files) contained in
> this package (such as "eufm" font) should be in a separate package
> (tetex-extra-fonts?).
>
> They are needed independingly of TeX (e.g. for math on the Web in
> MathML format).
>
This bug (and his brothers) mainly spoke about making the CM fonts
(.pfb and .afm files) of tetex-extra available to XFree and split
them off into a separate package. The reasons are described above.
Meanwhile there exist latex-xft-fonts, which should do the job
independent of teTeX and both browsers suggest the fonts. Therefore I
close the bug.
However me and other people from d-t-maint (thanks to Florent, Frank
and Atsuhito) put some work into #225004 I don't want to throw away.
Hence I posted the latest patch for it into #327480 together with a
TODO list.
I promise I don't have the time to work on this, so don't expect any
further action. Sorry!
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: