Re: Font problems with pdflatex
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
> Joerg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> wrote:
>
>> But I can compile the file with a latex 2 system and the pdf[1] looks
>> good, with the new latex 3 it[2] looks bad.
>>
>> [1] http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/~joergs/test-2.pdf
>> [1] http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/~joergs/test-3.pdf
>>
>> Build of test-2.pdf:
> [...]
>> (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/ae/ae.sty
>
> You must have made some local changes (e.g. to pdftex.cfg) that
> automatically loads this style, which no longer work in teTeX-3.0.
No. I added it to the example. Does this mean I should not use ae
anymore? Why is it in the package, if it's broken?
>> The same file with latex 2.0.2c (Sarge) and one time with latex 3.0
>> produce differt pdffiles. Why?
>
> Have a look at /etc/texmf/pdftex/, there should be a file /etc/texmf/pdftex/
> pdftex.cfg.postinst-bak. What does it contain?
I don't have /etc/texmf/pdftex/. BTW: Why you name your backup files
-bak? This is really uncommon and might confuse some scripts. Why not use
.bak?
Jörg.
--
at lilo press tab key | an Luftmatratzenpressetabulatorschlüssel
(Übersetzung von Personal Translator 2000)
Reply to: