[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CVS commits

Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:

> On 11.04.05 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>> Does anybody who is active on the list have a complete checkout of
>> the tetex-bin and -base 2.0.2 source trees, and enough disk space
>> to check out an other one and do the actual comparison? Please Cc
>> me if the answer is (partially) "no", I still have them.
> What I have is the 2.0.2c.orig.tar.gz and the diff.gz as of -7. As
> far as I understand the CVS log, you didn't make changes since them.

Note that the mess reported up to now was in tetex-bin.  Right now I
also found one corrupted file in tetex-base;
/cvs/tetex/tetex-base/debian/patches/Attic/suet.pdf.uu,v was a mbox file
with some NMU changelog messages from debian-changes...

But anyway, I have checked that the debian subdirectories of tetex-bin
and -base are in order, also texmf.d and new-manpages, at least as far
as unstable is concerned..  The only interesting comparison is between
the orig.tar.gz and the corresponding subdirs from a fresh checkout.

Regards, Frank
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Reply to: