Bug#265611: marked as done (tetex-extra: Problems with fmtutil again)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:17:29 -0400
with message-id <E1By5Wb-0006W9-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#265611: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2b-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2004 23:18:42 +0000
>From jimmy@g-tec.co.at Fri Aug 13 16:18:42 2004
Return-path: <jimmy@g-tec.co.at>
Received: from smartmx-06.inode.at [213.229.60.38]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BvlJq-0006MG-00; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:18:42 -0700
Received: from [83.64.198.178] (port=36285 helo=ultimate.g-tec.co.at)
by smartmx-06.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1BvlJj-0003xa-M9
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:18:35 +0200
Received: from jimmy by ultimate.g-tec.co.at with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BvlJT-0004OT-00; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:18:19 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jimmy@g-tec.co.at
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-extra: Problems with fmtutil again
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:18:18 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1BvlJT-0004OT-00@ultimate.g-tec.co.at>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.2a-3
Severity: important
Upgrading from previous version tells me:
--- snip ---
Get:1 http://localhost unstable/main tetex-extra 2.0.2a-3 [10.5MB]
Fetched 10.5MB in 58s (179kB/s)
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Reading changelogs...
(Reading database ... 72268 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace tetex-extra 2.0.2a-2 (using
.../tetex-extra_2.0.2a-3_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tetex-extra ...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2a-3) ...
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found.
fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/tetex-extra.postinst.XXbXoSy4
Please include this file if you report a bug.
dpkg: error processing tetex-extra (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-extra
--- snip ---
/tmp/tetex-extra.postinst.XXbXoSy4 is not attached, since it is empty.
I already had to face this problems with the previous versions of
tetex-extra and tetex-base. It's solved in tetex-base but in tetex-extra
there is still a problem in the postinst script. I fixed it by adding
the parameter --cnffile to the call for the commands fmtutil and updmap,
but this was just a dirty hack(I'm not sure if I've done it the right way).
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT@euro
Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.10.23 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii gsfonts 8.14+urwcyr1.0.7pre35-1 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
ii tetex-base 2.0.2a-3 Basic library files of teTeX
ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-17 The teTeX binary files
ii ucf 1.07 Update Configuration File: preserv
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265611-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2004 09:26:08 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Aug 20 02:26:08 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1By5ey-00053N-00; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 02:26:08 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1By5Wb-0006W9-00; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:17:29 -0400
From: =?utf-8?q?Frank_K=C3=BCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: 265611-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#265611: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2b-1
Message-Id: <E1By5Wb-0006W9-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:17:29 -0400
Delivered-To: 265611-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 2.0.2b-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_2.0.2b-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b-1.diff.gz
tetex-base_2.0.2b-1.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b-1.dsc
tetex-base_2.0.2b-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b-1_all.deb
tetex-base_2.0.2b.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2b.orig.tar.gz
tetex-doc_2.0.2b-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_2.0.2b-1_all.deb
tetex-extra_2.0.2b-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_2.0.2b-1_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 265611@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:45:26 +0200
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
tetex-doc - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 92594 264241 264388 265611 265832 266716
Changes:
tetex-base (2.0.2b-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Fixes RC bugs that are also in sarge, hence the urgency
* Another repackaged orig.tar.gz: To really remove the non-free floatflt
(RC bug #263549), the files also have to be removed from the
orig.tar.gz [frank]
* Move configuration files from /usr/share/texmf to /etc/texmf, and
create appropriate symlinks (closes: #92594) [frank]
* Remove bashism (and thinko, anyway) from tetex-extra's postrm, thanks
to Hilmar, Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, Florent Rougon
<f.rougon@free.fr> and Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org> (closes:
#264241)[frank]
* Test for the correct fmtutils.cnf file in the postinst scripts of
tetex-base and tetex-extra (closes: #265611) [frank]
* Fix tetex-extra's reportbug script and install a reportbug control
file, so that tetex-bin and tetex-extra are always reported together
with tetex-base, thanks to Hilmar (closes: #264388) [frank]
* Some fixes needed because of the introduction of VARTEXMF in 2.0.2a-2,
thanks to Hilmar [frank]
* Translations:
- updated french debconf translation, thanks to Clément Stenac
<zorglub@via.ecp.fr> (closes: #265832) [frank].
- updated danish debconf translation, thanks to Claus Hindsgaul
<claus_h@image.dk> (closes: #266716) [frank]
Files:
bec14ccfe122bb1d24d85774517a8759 838 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b-1.dsc
567b5d3f2be18559b42283abd91c10a4 52733444 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b.orig.tar.gz
a565b0ea4d5cdf33cac5ad2ba2a9189a 166566 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b-1.diff.gz
bf726a4b7d7c78d5399d03510b10b48e 14353726 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2b-1_all.deb
3298b9d8fa0afe64a8609463bbe86c18 10464116 tex optional tetex-extra_2.0.2b-1_all.deb
4aee35e207a89bf0cea9b8b5628de220 27743500 doc optional tetex-doc_2.0.2b-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBJNQ4+xs9YyJS+hoRAp4GAKCBPQufA+bOykvXRQum5O/NyTUc9ACghgIf
t7oYRwp2Ab3jfJwSPKJ5VHs=
=iuBJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: