Re: Bug#253098: fix to jadetex based on tetex changes
- To: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
- Cc: aph@debian.org, 253098@bugs.debian.org, debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org, jochen@scram.de, 264926@bugs.debian.org, Jordi Mallach <jordi@debian.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
- Subject: Re: Bug#253098: fix to jadetex based on tetex changes
- From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 23:20:10 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040813212009.GG1555@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>, aph@debian.org, 253098@bugs.debian.org, debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org, jochen@scram.de, 264926@bugs.debian.org, Jordi Mallach <jordi@debian.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040811163617.0524968187.qww314159@soup.acv.apexcovantage.com>
- References: <[🔎] 20040807225537.0193326482.qww314159@soup> <[🔎] oa657qz3nf.fsf@sopa.onshored.com> <[🔎] 20040811163617.0524968187.qww314159@soup.acv.apexcovantage.com>
On 11.08.04 Jay Berkenbilt (ejb@ql.org) wrote:
Hi *,
> That aside, there's been a lot of discussion, but I'm not sure
> there's a resolution. Here's my understanding of the points:
>
> * The decision to switch LaTeX to use etex instead of tex was made
> deliberately.
>
Yes.
> * Not everyone agrees about whether this fix was appropriate so close
> to the release.
>
I discussed that on debian-tetex-maint, and got only one answer. He
agreed. Yes, sorry the whole story came to my attention quite late.
> It also seems clear to me that there is a discussion going on between
> tetex and jadetex maintainers that should hopefully converge on some
> solution that means jadetex and tetex installs and upgrades all
> succeed.
>
Fixed.
H., don't read my sig!
--
You should go home.
http://hilmarpreusse.forum-rheinland.de/
Reply to: