[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#264043: fix to jadetex based on tetex changes



On 08.08.04 Jay Berkenbilt (ejb@ql.org) wrote:

Hi all,

> The patch fixes this problem by changing jadetex to work properly with
> .efmt files rather than the .fmt files it is now expecting.  It also
> makes jadetex a link to etex and pdfjadetex a link to pdfetex.  I
> have prepared the patch to NMU jadetex, but presumably the jadetex
> maintainer will accept the patch and make it a regular upload
> instead. (I've just gotten into the habit of preparing my patches
> to create NMUs, since if the package does get an NMU, it takes less
> effort!)
> 
> After rebuilding the package with this patch applied, I can now
> install jadetex in a pbuilder environment and then run both jadetex
> and pdfjadetex on a suitable file and see the output as expected.
> 
> --- debian/fmtutil.cnf.qdist    2004-08-07 22:45:05.000000000 -0400
> +++ debian/fmtutil.cnf  2004-08-07 22:46:36.000000000 -0400
> @@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
>  #                  invoke with 'fmtutil --cnffile <file>'
>  #
>  # format       engine  pattern-file    arguments
> -jadetex                tex     language.dat    &latex jadetex.ini
> -pdfjadetex     pdftex  language.dat    &pdflatex pdfjadetex.ini
> +jadetex                etex    language.dat    &latex jadetex.ini
> +pdfjadetex     pdfetex language.dat    &pdflatex pdfjadetex.ini
> 
Is guess that file is installed as /etc/texmf/fmt.d/xxjadetex.cnf and
then (hopefully) update-fmtutil is called. Perhaps it is a good idea
to write *jadetex.ini instead of jadetex.ini.

H., will have a look at the other grave bug.
-- 
sigmentation fault



Reply to: