Bug#182236: marked as done (sanity check: no dir, /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:56:16 -0400
with message-id <oa657xwbgv.fsf@sopa.onshored.com>
and subject line sanity check: no dir, /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2003 22:27:25 +0000
>From adam@onshored.com Sun Feb 23 16:27:24 2003
Return-path: <adam@onshored.com>
Received: from gopher.onshored.com [66.54.200.189] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18n4ai-0002oO-00; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:27:24 -0600
Received: from gopher.onshored.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by gopher.onshored.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C63E6A083
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:27:20 -0600 (CST)
Sender: adam@gopher.onshored.com
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: sanity check: no dir, /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
Organization: onShore Development, Inc
From: Adam DiCarlo <adam@onshored.com>
Date: 23 Feb 2003 16:27:20 -0600
Message-ID: <863cmek4zb.fsf@gopher.onshored.com>
Lines: 26
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NOSPAM_INC,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Severity: minor
Version: 2.0.1-1
I was messing with jadetex, creating a /etc/texmf/texmf.d/80JadeTeX
file but mistakenly put that in /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf/80JadeTeX .
This caused a tetex-bin error during postinst:
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
/usr/bin/texconfig: No $TEXMFMAIN in texmf.cnf file.
/usr/bin/texconfig: set TEXMFCNF variable to the directory where
teTeX's texmf.cnf file is in.
I recovered by hand with:
# rm -r /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
# update-texmf
I would suggest that you check if /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf is a directory
and remove it in postinst. Not a big deal -- the bug was really mine
due to the jadetex brokenness.
--
...Adam Di Carlo...<adam@onshored.com>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 182236-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2004 20:56:55 +0000
>From adam@onshored.com Thu Aug 05 13:56:55 2004
Return-path: <adam@onshored.com>
Received: from xena.bway.net (mail.bway.net) [216.220.96.26]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BspIF-0003xW-00; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 13:56:55 -0700
Received: (qmail 46526 invoked by uid 0); 5 Aug 2004 20:56:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sopa) (216.220.110.137)
by xena.bway.net with SMTP; 5 Aug 2004 20:56:24 -0000
Received: from sopa.onshored.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sopa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C688FB8D;
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:56:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: frank@kuesterei.ch (=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?=)
Cc: 182236-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: sanity check: no dir, /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
References: <863cmek4zb.fsf@gopher.onshored.com>
<87k70puydy.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
<[🔎] 873c35g60j.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
From: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
Organization: Debian
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:56:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 873c35g60j.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> (Frank
=?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCster's?= message of "Mon, 02 Aug 2004 12:59:24 +0200")
Message-ID: <oa657xwbgv.fsf@sopa.onshored.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 182236-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
> Should I close it?
It seems like kinda a stupid bug from me, in retrospect. So I'm
closing it.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@debian.org.....<URL:http://www.debian.org/>
Reply to: