[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Use etex instead of tex?



On 12.07.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:

Hi all,

> > Unfortunately just redirecting the soft link /usr/bin/latex isn't
> > sufficient. Before I further discuss about technical details:
> > what do you think about that idea?
> 
> If you feel this is something you would have fun concentrating on,
> go ahead. I'd rather release tetex with 10 more normal bugs and
> have it use (pdf)etex. Maybe you can backport the changes from
> tetex-beta.
> 
As you've read in dctt it's rather easy to do. The configure-script
of tetex-bin knows an option --with-etex=tex. In this case the
traditional Knuth TeX is not built at all and even /usr/bin/tex
points to etex. I don't know if this is a good idea. I thinks thats
to radical. I'd rather change only the two links /usr/bin/pdflatex
and /usr/bin/latex (and adapt fmtutil.cnf) and leave the rest
untouched.

Suggestions, hints?

H. 
-- 
Chef, n.:
	Any cook who swears in French.
  http://hilmarpreusse.forum-rheinland.de/



Reply to: