On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 10:22, Frank Küster wrote: > frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster) wrote, that's me: > > > Thank you, that seems to have helped (although the Makefile.in doesn't > > show to be generated by automake). However, I don't know whether it was > > _necessary_ at all - on casals (mips, for which you originally reported > > the bug) it showed pass_all just with the plain new upstream > > sources. And there doesn't seem to be an arm machine up with chroots. > > > > What should I do? > > Just upgrade, one would say. I should probably explain why I think it > may be better to do nothing, if that is just sufficient. > Chances are upstream are just using a newer version of Libtool at their end, either newer upstream or newer Debian -- it doesn't really matter :) If it says pass_all on mips and arm, it's fine. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part