[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#241089: Old cruft in Conflicts-lines



On 05.04.04 Atsuhito Kohda (kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp) wrote:

Hi,

> Well, to avoid confusion,
> 
> > [1] e.g.: Conflicts: texbin, xdvik, mflib, kpathsea, makeindex,
> > ps2pk, latex
> 
> the above entries really originate from pre-hamm packages.
> 
These are the entries I'm speaking about.

> > nextawg (<= 0.5.1-34), nextaw (<< 0.8-2)
> 
> nextawg, and nextaw would originate from tetex in potato (not sure
> but perhaps), i.e. because of a bug of xdvi with nextaw as far as I
> remembered.
> 
Er should check that before eventually removing it.

> > dvipdfm, alml
> > (<< 2002.08.29-4), jbibtex-bin (<< 3.0.5+0.04-2), jtex-bin (<=
> > 1.8-5.1), passivetex (<< 1.21-5), ptex-bin (<< 3.0.5+0.04-2), xmltex
> > (<< 1.9-4), cweb, tetex-base (<< 2.0.2-6)
> 
> These are necessary for woody (or at least potato) to sarge
> upgrade.  Some are included in teTeX 2.0 and others are for
> compatibility with update-texmf etc. scripts.
> 
I just quoted the whole line for explanation. Of course we have to be
careful. These entries above are at least actually necessary.

H. 
-- 
sigmentation fault



Reply to: