Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem

To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:16:07 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87pt146ars.fsf@florent.maison>
Mail-followup-to: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87hdmgakz5.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> (Frank Küster's message of "Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:22:06 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 876532klvn.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 87mzwddloy.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> <[🔎] 878y7vg8t0.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 87mzw9chdi.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> <[🔎] 87y8fs6ex6.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 87hdmgakz5.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>

Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:

> Yes, excuse me. In tetex-2, there is no problem, whereas in tetex-3.0
> (2.99 or whatever), tetex-bin's postinst fails if tetex-extra's mapfiles
> are in 00updmap.cfg.

OK.

-- 
Florent

Reply to:

References:
- Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>

Prev by Date: CVS frank tetex-base: imported upstream version 2.99.3 into experimental branch
Next by Date: Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
Previous by thread: Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
Next by thread: package sponsorship? asymptote: MetaPost-inspired graphics language
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread