Re: Another way to deal with the Font Map Problem
Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> schrieb:
> Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
>
>>> Why do you need to add a workaround?
>>> - tetex 2 -> you say it doesn't fail;
>>> - tetex 3 -> currently, lmodern is not split, and it will be split
>>> according to the new plan, which shouldn't fail.
>>
>> The problem is tetex-extra: Some map files are in tetex-extra, not base,
>> and need to be split of 00updmap.cfg. Therefore I need the scheme that
>> I was trying to implement even to be able to install tetex-extra.
>
> You are talking about tetex 3, aren't you? I still believe it doesn't
> fail in tetex 2.
Yes, excuse me. In tetex-2, there is no problem, whereas in tetex-3.0
(2.99 or whatever), tetex-bin's postinst fails if tetex-extra's mapfiles
are in 00updmap.cfg.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: