Bug#266718: marked as forwarded (dvips: Fails to properly include fonts used both in EPS and in document)
Your message dated Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:43:58 +0200
with message-id <20041025074358.GD1208@preusse>
has caused the Debian Bug report #266718,
regarding dvips: Fails to properly include fonts used both in EPS and in document
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) TeX-k Mailing List <tex-k@mail.tug.org>, 266718-forwarded@bugs.debian.org.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 266718-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2004 07:44:41 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Mon Oct 25 00:44:41 2004
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CLzWy-0007VL-00; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:44:41 -0700
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.101 #44)
id 1CLzWM-00072t-00; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:44:02 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:43:59 +0200
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:43:58 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: TeX-k Mailing List <tex-k@mail.tug.org>,
266718-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
Subject: (fwd) Bug#266718: dvips: Fails to properly include fonts used both in EPS and in document
Message-ID: <20041025074358.GD1208@preusse>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.11(0.116/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 266718-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi all,
We've got here a bug report about a font inclusion problem. Sorry,
I'm even sure that this is an dvips problem. I could reproduce it
using tetex 2.0.2 on Windows, converting the ps-file using Acrobat
Distiller 5.0 (Windows) and then viewing it using that program.
preusse@preusse ~ $ dvips --version
dvips(k) 5.92b
kpathsea version 3.4.5
Kind Regards,
Hilmar
----- Forwarded message from Dylan Thurston <dpt@math.harvard.edu> -----
From: Dylan Thurston <dpt@math.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: Dylan Thurston <dpt@math.harvard.edu>,
266718@bugs.debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#266718: dvips: Fails to properly include fonts used both in EPS and in document
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:55:29 -0400
Message-Id: <20040818195529.DF840102A@lotus>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
X-Mailing-List: <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/8836
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-18
Severity: normal
Dvips will in some circumstances fail to include all the needed fonts
(or at least produces documents that gs will not display correctly).
This happens when there is a font which is used both in an included
EPS file and in the document itself: the characters do not display
inside of the figure. Just looking at the file sizes, I think I can
see one problem: fonts that are used only in the EPS file are included
in full, while fonts that are used in both the EPS file and in the
document are included only partially, thus missing any characters used
in the included file. This is not the only problem, however, since
even characters in the EPS that do appear in the document do not
appear in the figures.
Attached are some minimal test cases. Run mpost on fig.mp (which just
produces an EPS file with '-25' in Computer Modern), then latex
test.tex and run dvips on it. Note that the minus sign, from cmsy10,
appears in the output, while the '25', from cmr10, does not, since the
document itself uses cmr10 but not cmsy10.
As a workaround, you can add the '-j0' option to dvips.
<snip>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-tetex-maint-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
----- End forwarded message -----
--
sigmentation fault
--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fig.mp"
prologues := 2;
beginfig(0);
label(btex $-25$ etex, origin);
endfig;
end
--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: application/x-tex
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="test.tex"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\documentclass{article}=0A\usepackage{graphicx}=0A=0A\begin{document}=0AThi=
s is a test.=0A\[=0A+35=0A\]=0A\[=0A\includegraphics{fig.0}=0A\]=0A\end{doc=
ument}=0A
--huq684BweRXVnRxX--
Reply to: