Bug#267299: Installation of tetex-base (2.0.2b-3) fails.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
>
> >>
> > #267886. Bug has been fixed. We're on the way to create a fix in the
> > postin of tetex-bin for /etc/texmf/langauge.dat.
>
> Hm. There is yet a fix in tetex-bin's postinst, although a problematic
> one. But it _should_ fix this bug.
>
> Maciej, which version of tetex-bin had you installed, or do you have
> installed while you can reproduce the bug? In you first message, you
> wrote:
>
> >> Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
> >> ii dpkg 1.10.23 Package maintenance system for Deb
> >> ii gsfonts 8.14+urwcyr1.0.7pre35-1 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
> >> pn tetex-bin Not found.
> >> ii ucf 1.08 Update Configuration File: preserv
>
> But this cannot have been true at the moment the bug occured, because
> then it would not even have tried to generate those formats.
>
Ugh, can't tell you. I fixed it manually and it works now.
But the problem occured for the first time while i was uprading
the system 2-3 weeks ago. It could be that for the first time it
was in tetex-bin and in next upgrade it occured while setting up
tetex-base. So packages were installed but not configured.
Hm tetex-base's postinst is using file that is installed by tetex-bin ?
Is it ok ?
--
Pozdrawiam
maf
Reply to: