[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#244601: tetex-bin: package fails to configure: Error: `mpost -ini -jobname=metafun -progname=mpost metafun.mp' failed



Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:

> Okay.  This machine has been steadily upgraded since potato.
>
>
> branden@necrotic:~$ ls -al /usr/share/texmf/metapost/context
> total 212
> drwxr-xr-x    3 root     root         4096 Nov 16 20:17 .
> drwxr-xr-x    7 root     root         4096 Nov 16 20:17 ..
> drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Nov 16 20:17 base
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         1346 May 28  2001 metafun.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         7117 Jun  2  2000 mp-back.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2274 Jul 27  2000 mp-butt.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        25857 Jun  4  2001 mp-char.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        34707 Jan 26  2000 mp-chart.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        13281 Jul  4  2001 mp-core.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         7112 Apr  6  2001 mp-grph.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         7848 Aug  7  2000 mp-page.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        10960 Jun  7  2001 mp-shap.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         7881 May 31  2001 mp-spec.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        11480 Jun  7  2001 mp-step.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         5925 Oct 27  2000 mp-text.mp
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        47303 Jun 26  2001 mp-tool.mp
> branden@necrotic:~$ ls -al /usr/share/texmf/metapost/context/base
> total 8
> drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Nov 16 20:17 .
> drwxr-xr-x    3 root     root         4096 Nov 16 20:17 ..
>
> Some of those dates look suspiciously old.  Did earlier versions of a tetex
> package play around with symlinks to directories?

We do that even currently, but only in order to be able to move some
directories outside /usr (namely, /etc/texmf/* and two directories in
/var) or to /usr/share/doc. Within /usr/share/texmf, I there are no
symlinks to directories, and don't know of any that were. However I've
joined the team only recently, does anybody else remember anything here?

>> Or is it 100% Debian Package Management? 
>
> Yes.

It seems the bug is really in a very old version, or there might be some
interruption while an earlier version of tetex-extra was removed. What I
don't understand at all is why this bug has been triggered now. Did you
upgrade tetex after a longer period of sticking to stable, or an older
testing image?

Regards, Frank

P.S. I've taken my laptop home without the power cable. Therefore I
might be forced to complete inactivity later this weekend.
-- 
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie




Reply to: