Bug#232870: marked as done (tetex-base: Include Danish debconf template)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:32:12 -0500
with message-id <E1AwvD2-0003VD-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#232870: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 15:20:42 +0000
>From claus@image.dk Sun Feb 15 07:20:42 2004
Return-path: <claus@image.dk>
Received: from fitch6.uni2.net [130.227.52.109]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AsO4Y-0000rQ-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 07:20:42 -0800
Received: from reber (129.142.124.192.ip.tele2adsl.dk [129.142.124.192])
by fitch6.uni2.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1FFKdsQ025043;
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:20:40 +0100
Received: from claus by reber with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AsO6G-0000Vh-BV; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:22:28 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1255085543=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base: Include Danish debconf template
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.46
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:22:28 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1AsO6G-0000Vh-BV@reber>
Sender: Claus Hindsgaul <claus@reber>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============1255085543==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2-5.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please include the attached Danish debconf translation
--===============1255085543==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/x-po; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="da.po"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by fitch6.uni2.net id i1FFKdsQ025043
# translation of da.po to Danish
# translation of tetex-base debconf to Danish
# Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: da\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-03-18 07:51+0900\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-02-15 16:20+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>\n"
"Language-Team: Danish <dansk@klid.dk>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.0.2\n"
#. Description
#: ../templates:4
msgid "Remove old conffiles?"
msgstr "Fjern gamle ops=C3=A6tningsfiler?"
#. Description
#: ../templates:4
msgid ""
"Old conffiles from a previous version of tetex-base were found. Most of =
"
"these were map files for dvips and now removed from the upstream source.=
"
msgstr ""
"Der blev fundet gamle ops=C3=A6tningsfiler fra en tidligere version af t=
etex-base. "
"De fleste af disse var map-filer til dvips, som nu er fjernet fra "
"originalprogrammet."
#. Description
#: ../templates:4
#, no-c-format
msgid ""
"If you think you have modified such files, then you may refuse this opti=
on "
"and preserve them. You can find the list of such conffiles in /var/lib/=
dpkg/"
"info/tetex-base.config but, for almost 99% of you, it is strongly "
"recommended to remove these files right now!"
msgstr ""
"Hvis du tror, du har =C3=A6ndret s=C3=A5danne filer, kan du bevare dem v=
ed at afvise "
"denne valgmulighed. Du finder listen over s=C3=A5danne ops=C3=A6tningsfi=
ler i filen"
"/var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.config, men det anbefales kraftigt alle an=
dre "
"at fjerne disse filer nu!"
#. Description
#: ../templates:16
msgid "Remove old updmap?"
msgstr "Fjern gammel updmap?"
#. Description
#: ../templates:16
msgid ""
"Old /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap from a previous version of tetex-base were "
"found. This script was completely rewritten and its behavior was change=
d "
"essentially from the previous version."
msgstr ""
"Der blev fundet en gammel /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap fra en tidligere versi=
on "
"af tetex-base. Dette skript er omskrevet helt og dets opf=C3=B8rsel =C3=A6=
ndret "
"afg=C3=B8rende fra den tidligere version."
#. Description
#: ../templates:16
#, no-c-format
msgid ""
"If you think you have modified this file, then you may refuse this optio=
n "
"and preserve it but, for almost 99% of you, it is strongly recommended t=
o "
"remove this file right now!"
msgstr ""
"Hvis du tror, du har =C3=A6ndret denne fil, kan du bevare den ved at afv=
ise denne "
"valgmulighed, men det anbefales kraftigt alle andre at fjerne denne "
"fil nu!"
#. Description
#: ../templates:28
msgid "Remove old dat files for texdoctk?"
msgstr "Fjern gamle dat-filer til texdoctk?"
#. Description
#: ../templates:28
msgid ""
"Old dat files for texdoctk from a previous version of tetex-base were "
"found. They were texdoc-100.dat, texdoc-102.dat, texdoc-103.dat and the=
y "
"were for texdoctk only in teTeX beta version."
msgstr ""
"Der blev fundet gamle dat-filer til texdoctk fra en tidligere version "
"af tetex-base. De var texdoc-100.dat, texdoc-102.dat, texdoc-103.dat "
"og de var kun til en betaversion af teTeX-texdoctk."
#. Description
#: ../templates:28
#, no-c-format
msgid ""
"If you think you have modified such them, then you may refuse this optio=
n "
"and preserve them but, for almost 99% of you, it is strongly recommended=
to "
"remove these files right now!"
msgstr ""
"Hvis du tror, du har =C3=A6ndret disse filer, kan du bevare dem ved at a=
fvise "
"denne valgmulighed, men det anbefales kraftigt alle andre at fjerne "
"disse filer nu!"
--===============1255085543==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 232870-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2004 03:38:02 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Feb 27 19:38:02 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AwvIg-0005jL-00; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:38:02 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AwvD2-0003VD-00; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:32:12 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 232870-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.44 $
Subject: Bug#232870: fixed in tetex-base 2.0.2-6
Message-Id: <E1AwvD2-0003VD-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:32:12 -0500
Delivered-To: 232870-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level:
Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 2.0.2-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_2.0.2-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2-6.diff.gz
tetex-base_2.0.2-6.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2-6.dsc
tetex-base_2.0.2-6_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0.2-6_all.deb
tetex-doc_2.0.2-6_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_2.0.2-6_all.deb
tetex-extra_2.0.2-6_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_2.0.2-6_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 232870@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 23:35:48 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
tetex-doc - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 229725 232870
Changes:
tetex-base (2.0.2-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Cleaned up a bit; suggested by Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> [kohda]
- removed debian/ttlkeys.def which was not used any more.
- removed surplus marvosym.pfb from tetex-doc but this caused duplicated
marvosym.pfb in tetex-base so we removed (possibly) unnecessary
/usr/share/doc/texmf/fonts/marvosym/marvosym.pfb with rules.
* Added arabtex (<= 3.10-5) to Conflicts: entry. (Closes: #229725) [kohda]
* Refined a test for TEXMFMAIN in postinst suggested by Florent Rougon
<f.rougon@free.fr>. Thanks to Florent Rougon. [kohda]
* Removed language.dat handling from postinst for our new mechanism
suggested by Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch>. Now language.dat
would be handled with tetex-bin only. Thanks to Frank Küster. [kohda]
- Also we modified prerm of tetex-base with a patch by Frank.
* Run "debconf-updatepo" which I forgot to run. [kohda]
* Fixed control file. Thanks to Florent Rougon, Frank Küster and Hilmar
Preusse. [kohda]
- tetex-base: removed Replace: tetex-bin (<< 2.0.2-2) because there was
Conflicts: tetex-bin (<= 2.0.2-3) already.
- tetex-extra: removed Replaces: tetex-base (<< 2.0-2) and added
Conflicts: tetex-base (<< 2.0-2) which should be correct relation.
- tetex-doc: removed Replaces: tetex-extra (<< 2.0) and added
Conflicts: tetex-extra (<< 2.0) in the same reason as above.
* Included da.po by Claus Hindsgaul <claus_h@image.dk>. Thanks to
Claus Hindsgaul. [kohda] (Closes: #232870)
Files:
ba33f41a03dbaba31707af885027a7fe 816 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2-6.dsc
7cae952486aea7fd270c2168070fb2c0 134174 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2-6.diff.gz
62291b3c1bd889e2a0bf25f2768c956b 14003078 tex optional tetex-base_2.0.2-6_all.deb
3155f77285bfc35de0e0ef9dee0f3959 10516520 tex optional tetex-extra_2.0.2-6_all.deb
1746fab0746eaad700e105d307ca459c 27466200 doc optional tetex-doc_2.0.2-6_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAP19Z1IXdL1v6kOwRAk5GAJ9gygWkW+qer1NUNMcqyel6WhVioQCfTh5d
SgvnO88DdCTswuL3GSTMu+I=
=wmP2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: