Re: Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package
frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster) wrote:
> Excuse me for the crippled version of this mail, it was sent by
> mistake.
Didn't receive anything (yet ;-).
>> foo- and bar-baz is German, I believe. :)
>
> ... the afm and pfb-files... is correct?
I'm not a native English speaker, but I would write: "the AFM and PFB
files". Depending on how the description is rewritten, it could also
very well boil down to "the metrics and glyph files" or something like
this.
>> You may have a look at bug #112140 and explicitely depend on xutils
>> (>= 4.1.0-12).
>
> I didn't inspect this closely, but it seems to me if this is right,
> there is a bug in debhelper, isn't it?
Exactly (perhaps only in its manpage: I didn't even try the
${misc:Depends} to see if it would put the "wrong" version for the
dependency). I didn't report this because I was lazy, but I will do so
sooner or later (if not already reported)...
>> grep -E '\.(afm|pfb)$$'
>
> What's the second $ for?
Make will eat it (remember debian/rules is a Makefile...).
>> + sort debian/tetex-extra.files debian/tetex-extra-fonts.files | uniq -u > tetex-extra.tmp
>> + mv -f tetex-extra.tmp debian/tetex-extra.files
>>
>> IMHO, debian/tetex-extra-fonts.files has nothing to do here. I think you
>> wanted to uniq -u tetex-extra-fonts.files for fear of files listed
>> several times, but this is not was is performed.
>
> He's taking out the contents of tetex-extra-fonts.files from
> tetex-extra.files. One could of course use grep -v, like above.
Perhaps he's meaning to do so, but he's not doing so. At the time the
sort is performed, tetex-extra-fonts.files is a subset of
tetex-extra.files. Having them both as arguments to the sort is no
different than having only tetex-extra.files. tetex-extra.files will get
sorted and uniq'ed, great. That's all. Or am I mistaken?
--
Florent
Reply to: