Bug#213310: tetex-base: the dvips database should not be in /etc

[Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>]

From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Subject: Bug#213310: tetex-base: the dvips database should not be in /etc
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:53:45 +0100

> If there is an agreement that my changes are senseful, we should
> modify our packages and then start filing bugs against the affected
> packages.
> Any objections out there?

No objection but I have an impression that we are in
a very delicate situation.

- not so sure but there will be not so much time untill the 
release of sarge

- it seemed CVS server isn't recovered yet.  At least I failed
to CVS update, for example, and I don't know when it will
be recovered.

- and, rather personal issue but, I'll have less time for
packaging around Dec. and Jan., perhaps.

- there is also an important and big patch of Michael.

Should we work outside CVS for a while to upload new version 
or should we wait untill CVS server is recovered ?

Regards,		       2003-12-22(Mon)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima