Re: plan of next upload
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Subject: plan of next upload (was: Re: po-debconf template for tetex-bin)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:12:30 +0100
> > problem of upgrading pxfonts might need a bit more investigation, I
> > guess.
> >
> Well, we had a thread started on Sep 15 by me about that (Subject was
> "#197870, #197891, #197954").
Yes, I know that thread but I am lazy and didn't follow
them at that time.
> My final solution was to ask the question about
> removing /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap in the config-stage, but delay the
> removal at least to the preinst stage. My guess was, that it doesn't
> hurt us if we don't remove that file in the config stage, so we
> should delay it until the prerm-skript of pxfonts has been executed.
I read the thread again and I thought I could got your
point. So your solution was;
debian/config:
if [ -f ${etcdir}/updmap ]; then
db_input high tetex-base/oldupdm || true
db_go || true
fi
debian/postinst:
if [ -f ${etcdir}/updmap ]; then
db_get tetex-base/oldupdm || true
if [ X"$RET" = X"true" ]; then
rm -f ${etcdir}/updmap*
fi
fi
(a bit modified but this would be your intention, I guess.)
It seemd simple, clean and reasonable fix. If anyone
doesn't find a problem I will do this fix in our CVS.
> Further: tetex-doc Recommends tetex-bin. I would as alternative
> recommend dvi2tty. Additionally we need html-viewer, pdf-viewer,
> postscript-viewer. So:
>
> Recommends: tetex-bin (>> 2.0) | dvitty, pdf-viewer, postscript-viewer, www-browser
>
> dvi2tty displays dvi-Files on a terminal without needing the whole
> teTeX-stuff. The version in unstable is GPL.
> Sorry, for speaking about that in this thread. I've deleted already
> the other one from my HD.
No problem. And this idea looks reasonable too.
Regards, 2003-10-31(Fri)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: