Bug#108448: marked as done (wrong hyphen.cfg used when cslatex installed)
Your message dated Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:29:37 +0200
with message-id <20030820172937.GA5395@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line Bug#108448: wrong hyphen.cfg used when cslatex installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2001 02:48:22 +0000
>From m_schnei@gmx.de Sat Aug 11 21:48:22 2001
Return-path: <m_schnei@gmx.de>
Received: from nafp2-129.rz.uni-frankfurt.de (woglintel.private-site.uucp) [141.2.23.129]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15VlIa-0001D5-00; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 21:48:21 -0500
Received: from m_schnei by woglintel.private-site.uucp with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15Vkyv-0002ud-00; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 04:28:01 +0200
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 04:28:01 +0200
From: Michael Schneider <m_schnei@woglintel>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: wrong hyphen.cfg used when cslatex installed
Message-ID: <20010812042801.A11187@woglintel>
Reply-To: m_schnei@gmx.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
Sender: Michael Schneider <m_schnei@gmx.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: wrong hyphen.cfg used when cslatex installed
Package: tetex-base
Version: 1.0-10
Severity: normal
Hi!
First of all, this is a sequel to my Bug#105383 report on Jul 15,
but I decided to do a new report. So you can close #105383 now
and try to fix this one.
Secondly, this is not only a problem with package "tetex-base",
but with the whole TeX system.
Third, this seems to be an error with TeTeX, not Debian, but I'm
not quite sure (does the czech latex stuff belong to TeTeX?),
so perhaps you want to forward this bug report to the upstream author.
But let's start now!
My old problem was that, after upgrading to Potato, selecting
german with babel didn't work anymore. Finally I have found the
reason for my problem. For some strange reason I not only installed
the TeX packages from the STD and OPT priority, but also the=20
*czech* packages "cslatex", "csplain", etc. from the Xtr section
(don't ask me why... maybe because I like the czech girls? :) ).
Now, as I told you, babel didn't work correct, so I did a=20
"fmtutil --all"
to remake all the format files. I did not change any of the files=20
in "/etc/texmf" (not necessary, because "language.dat" is alright=20
for my purposes: german and ngerman are defined and point to the=20
correct files), but after that, the problem hasn't gone. So I looked=20
into the logfile
"/var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.log"
which has been written along with the remade format file, and here is=20
the result (an excerpt):
<snip>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Local configuration file hyphen.cfg used
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/cslatex/hyphen.cfg
Loading english hyphenation patterns and exceptions
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/hyphen.tex)
Loading czech hyphenation patterns and exceptions for IL2
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/czhyphen.tex)
Loading czech hyphenation patterns and exceptions for T1
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/czhyphen.tex)
Loading slovak hyphenation patterns and exceptions for IL2
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/skhyphen.tex)
Loading slovak hyphenation patterns and exceptions for T1
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/skhyphen.tex))
=20
<snap>
As you can see, it's the wrong "hyphen.cfg", which has been loaded;
the right one is that in "tex/generic/babel". When I did a
find . -name 'hyphen.cfg'
from the toplevel dir (/usr/share/texmf), I got *3* different=20
files "hyphen.cfg", and the czech one was the first in the list.=20
So I assume, that TeTeX gets this instead of babel's, by using=20
it's ls-R mechanism.
Now, I purged all the czech stuff, and did again a remake of the
formats. After that, everything seems to be alright with "latex.log":
<snip>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Local configuration file hyphen.cfg used
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/hyphen.cfg
File: hyphen.cfg 1999/05/05 v3.6x Babel language switching mechanism
\l@american=3D\language0
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/ushyph1.tex)
\l@USenglish=3D\language0
\l@english=3D\language0
\l@french=3D\language1
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/fr19998t.tex
fr19998t.tex - french hyphenation patterns (V2.5) <1999/03/08>)
\l@patois=3D\language1
\l@german=3D\language2
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/dehypht.tex
German Traditional Hyphenation Patterns `dehypht' Version 3.2a <1999/03/03>
(Formerly known under the name `ghyph31' and `ghyphen'.))
\l@austrian=3D\language2
\l@ngerman=3D\language3
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/dehyphn.tex
German New Hyphenation Patterns `dehyphn' Rev.28 <1999-03-08> (WaS)
(Formerly known under the name `gnhyph01'.))
\l@naustrian=3D\language3
\l@nohyphenation=3D\language4
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/zerohyph.tex))
<snap>
I wrote some latex testfiles, and I did not find any errors.
My conclusion is, that this error isn't a very hard problem, but it should
be fixed someday, because if there are any people talking both czech *and*=
=20
german (or french or...), they perhaps won't find a solution for this=20
problem. It took me several hours, and I am a somewhat experienced=20
computer user (though not an experienced TeX admin).
Greetings,
Michael
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux woglintel 2.2.16 #5 Tue Aug 1 04:52:30 CEST 2000 i586
Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii dpkg-perl 0.1-3.0 Perl interface modules for dpk=
g =20
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/texmf/dvips/config.ps changed [not included]
/etc/texmf/modes.mf changed [not included]
--=20
Michael Schneider <m_schnei@gmx.de>
sending M$ Windows the KILL sig...
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: YD6rBBB6C64+XyF4VG7X1+Zpnb1/TrRR
iQA/AwUBO3XpsEC7lTHv4KdIEQK89QCghQzXtfGM3u4FbFYqE72mblagt6gAoM9P
rNTjjwVDupYJovshGzBCvitu
=Folb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 108448-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2003 23:30:59 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Wed Aug 20 18:30:57 2003
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp02.web.de (smtp.web.de) [217.72.192.151]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19pcPp-0001IT-00; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:30:57 -0500
Received: from [213.7.202.120] (helo=preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de)
by smtp.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.99 #448)
id 19pcPn-0008Jc-00
for 108448-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 01:30:56 +0200
Received: by preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 300E64745; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:29:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:29:37 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 108448-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#108448: wrong hyphen.cfg used when cslatex installed
Message-ID: <20030820172937.GA5395@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <20020319214705.B5322@hera.rbi.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> <20030721204814.GA22338@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030721204814.GA22338@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Hilmar Preusse Inc.
X-Uptime: 19:12:31 up 1 day, 19:19, 3 users, load average: 1.13, 1.07, 1.01
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.21 i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR: 4 packets (139.97 stats units) [2.36 Mnodes/s]
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 108448-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.2 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,
FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On 21.07.03 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote:
> drachi:[~] #apt-get install cslatex cstexfonts csplain
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Package cslatex has no available version, but exists in the database.
> This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency
> and never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the
> contents of sources.list
> However the following packages replace it:
> tetex-base
> E: Package cslatex has no installation candidate
>
> Same for cstexfonts and csplain. (Debian stable) So can we close that
> bug?
>
I've got something like a permission to close that bug from the
submitter:
---------------------
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:54:50PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 23.07.03 Michael Schneider (m_schnei@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de) wrote:
> > I have not yet upgraded to stable (3.0). So I cannot tell you. Sorry!
> >
> Me again. I can't reproduce that bug any more, due to the
> disappearing packages. Is it Ok, to close that bug now?
As I said, I cannot decide myself! But if you cannot reproduce it, there
should be no problem with closing that bug. If I should ever upgrade
to stable and have the same difficulties again, I will tell you again! :-)
Bye,
Michael
---------------------
Closing,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: