Bug#204027: tetex-doc: Package doesn't include latex.ltx documentation
On 11.08.03 Frank Küster (frank@kuesterei.ch) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:
Hi,
> > I'm afraid not: Did you have a look at tetex-base/tetex-extra from
> > stable? The Style-Files and the FD-Files for the ae-fonts are in
> > tetex-extra, meanwhile the tfm's and vf's are in tetex-base...
> > Did that change in unstable?
>
> frank@alhambra:~$ dlocate -l tetex-base
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name Version Description
> +++-=====================-=====================-============================================================
> ii tetex-base 2.0.2-4.1 basic teTeX library files
> frank@alhambra:~$ dlocate /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/public/ae/aett8.tfm
> tetex-base: /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/public/ae/aett8.tfm
> frank@alhambra:~$
>
> It seems that this particular thing has changed.
>
Sure?
drachi:[tetex] >dpkg-deb -c tetex-base_2.0.2-4.1_all.deb|grep ae|grep tfm|wc
51 306 5081
drachi:[tetex] >dpkg-deb -c tetex-extra_2.0.2-4.1_all.deb|grep ae|grep sty|wc
3 18 279
drachi:[tetex] >dpkg-deb -c tetex-extra_2.0.2-4.1_all.deb|grep ae|grep fd|wc
12 72 1111
drachi:[tetex] >
It may partially makes sense, cause one can use the tfm's and the
vf's without the LaTeX-stuff...
> However, I still believe we should think about the right way to
> split tetex into packages. However, I will start a new thread on
> debian-tetex-maint instead of answering to one particular bug
> report.
>
Well in the moment I'm quite to lazy to think about that, hence I
stop whining.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: