On 19 Feb 2003, Fabien Ninoles <fabien@tzone.org> wrote: > I also included a short version of break-docbook.fo, with most of the > unnecessary tag remove, to better isolate the problem. There did not seem to be any file attached to your mail or to #181444. Producing a smaller test case does sound like a good idea. I'm not sure if docbook-xml is producing invalid FO, or if xmltex/passivetex/tetex is misinterpreting valid FO. > Let at least change it to passivetex. That's fine with me. Thanks, -- Martin
Attachment:
pgpAmvxoftgwz.pgp
Description: PGP signature