[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#95995: marked as done (tetex-bin: pdflatex depends on tetex-extra)



Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2003 09:17:49 -0500
with message-id <E18Up7V-00077G-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#95995: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2001 22:31:06 +0000
>From nconway@klamath.dyndns.org Tue May 01 17:31:06 2001
Return-path: <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
Received: from cr1006145-a.yec1.on.wave.home.com (metro.dyndns.org) [24.112.188.210] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14uifi-0003lw-00; Tue, 01 May 2001 17:31:06 -0500
Received: from nconway by metro.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 14uifm-0001tU-00; Tue, 01 May 2001 18:31:10 -0400
From: Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: pdflatex depends on tetex-extra
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <E14uifm-0001tU-00@metro.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 18:31:10 -0400
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20001218-3
Severity: normal

Hi,

I installed tetex-bin and tetex-base (plus the necessary
dependancies), and tried to run pdflatex. It didn't work:

[nconway:/home/nconway/work/misc/cuspidor]% pdflatex luke_response.tex
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159-14f-released-20000525 (Web2C 7.3.1)
I can't find the format file `pdflatex.fmt'!

(latex on the same file works fine).

After installing tetex-extra, the problem goes away, and
pdflatex works properly. Therefore, it appears to me that
pdflatex depends on tetex-extra.

Cheers,

Neil

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux metro 2.4.4 #1 Tue May 1 13:52:41 EDT 2001 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debianutils    1.15           Miscellaneous utilities specific to Debian.
ii  dpkg           1.9.2          Package maintenance system for Debian
ii  ed             0.2-19         The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6          2.2.2-4        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libkpathsea3   1.0.7+20001218 shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii  libpng2        1.0.10-2       PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-0.01042 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  libtiff3g      3.5.5-3        Tag Image File Format library
ii  libwww0        5.3.2-2        The W3C-WWW library.
ii  libxaw7        4.0.3-1        X Athena widget set library
ii  tetex-base     1.0.2+20000804 basic teTeX library files
ii  xlibs          4.0.3-1        X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g         1.1.3-14       compression library - runtime
libwww-ssl0	Not installed or no info
ii  perl-base      5.6.0-21       The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister.
	^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5-base)

--- Ignoring modified conffile /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf (>8k)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 95995-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2003 14:23:25 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Sat Jan 04 08:23:24 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18UpCu-0004WK-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 08:23:24 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 18Up7V-00077G-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 09:17:49 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 95995-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $
Subject: Bug#95995: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-4
Message-Id: <E18Up7V-00077G-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 09:17:49 -0500
Delivered-To: 95995-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-4.diff.gz
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-4.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-4.dsc
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-4_all.deb
tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-4_all.deb
tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 95995@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:50:57 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20021025-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description: 
 tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
 tetex-doc  - teTeX documentation
 tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 45930 62539 70581 95995 111561 139298 143751 170382 173872
Changes: 
 tetex-base (1.0.2+20021025-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added note for tetex maintainers about how to create orig.tar.gz
     This is irrelevant for users but might be helpful for maintainers
     cooperation.  [kohda]
   * Now postinst and tetex-extra.postinst checked the existence of
     /etc/texmf/fmtutil.cnf" before running "texconfig init".  [kohda]
     (Closes: #62539)
   * Now updmap.cfg is not a conffile but a configuration file generated by
     update-updmap of tetex-bin.  [kohda]  (Closes: #70581)
   * Found extsizes was included.  [kohda]  (Closes: #111561)
   * Removed unnecessary /etc/X11/Xresources from dirs.  [kohda]
   * Moved eurosym and texdoctk stuffs in tetex-extra so modified dependency
     correspondingly.  [kohda]  (Closes: #173872, #170382)
   * Moved pdftex/pdflatex stuffs in tetex-base so now pdftex/pdflatex
     should work without tetex-extra.  [kohda]
     (Closes: #143751, #95995, #139298)
   * Removed FMT files when tetex-extra would be removed.  Note, obsolete
     omaga.fmt and lambda.fmt would be removed with preinst of tetex-bin.
     [kohda]  (Closes: #45930)
   * Fixed handling way of psfonts.map pdftex.map ; first removed
     obsolete wrong files if any in preinst and set them up correctly in
     postinst.  [kohda]
   * Tried to remove obsolete conffiles with debconf.  [kohda]
   * Fixed handling of /usr/share/texmf/doc in rules; in the former version
     symlinks were messed up.  In this time, they would be corrected and #170592
     should be fixed really.
Files: 
 ace368ff9cfeb97467afe094d5a6d01d 807 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-4.dsc
 8ccd67f477f1d8a58438f508238e6078 37666 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-4.diff.gz
 e62c5f4a1fe8535390f65bcc62d8c5f9 17527308 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-4_all.deb
 9446474b1bad527afeffc19bd38c402d 10374052 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-4_all.deb
 4c49a6463140f35fded94f805c451acc 21100232 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-4_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+FuDo1IXdL1v6kOwRAoiKAJsG00SfsYYMpAK3/2d5wd9V8U6YHwCeJPx+
tbdndoRwJ85kghMtLUNXs1A=
=yAdG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: