Re: Bits from tetex maintainers
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:19:49PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Could well work. Also, since updmap is the only file which reads
> > updmap.cfg, it may not be hard to convert it to read updmap.cfg AND
> > the updmap.d directory directly, without rewriting the updmap.cfg
> > file. Although it probably makes sense if all of the config files in
> > tetex work in the same way.
>
> so if this is really not so hard, this might be better than
> my idea. Anyway, this issue concerns conffiles and/or
> configuration files, we should decide how to do.
Consistency is probably the more important consideration here, so
let's go with an update-updmap (even though "updmap" stands for
"update map" ;-). updmap does have a few tricky bits in it, so this
is probably the better approach.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, website: http://www.polya.uklinux.net/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Reply to: