Re: tetex in CVS -- suggestion
From: Julian Gilbey <jdg@polya.uklinux.net>
Subject: tetex in CVS -- suggestion
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:04:43 +0000
> Why not create new CVS trees: tetex-{bin,base}-debian, which contain
> *only* the debian/ directory (or only the contents of the debian
> directory), so that we only have a tiny repository for these packages,
> and that we don't have to concern ourselves with the messy symlinks
> etc. in the upstream package? It means that we can't use
> cvs-buildpackage, but that is a small loss.
This sounds good to me.
From: Julian Gilbey <jdg@polya.uklinux.net>
Subject: Re: tetex in CVS -- suggestion
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:18:51 +0000
> The only disadvantage is that the .diff.gz will contain the CVS files,
> but that seems bearable given the advantages that this will bring.
I'm not sure but after cvs committing, remove debian
directory and then "cvs export tetex-bin-debian -d debian"
as you first suggested will generate *.diff.gz without
the CVS, I guess.
And it will be better then to move new-manpages and texmf.d
under debian/
Further, the lines in rules;
-rm -rf debian/tmp `find debian/* -type d ! -name CVS ! -name patches `\
debian/files*
should be modified (but I dout that this line is really necessary.
Is there any possibility that any directories are left unremoved?)
Best regards, 2002/11/29
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
Reply to: