Bug#173684: marked as done (tetex-bin won't install)
Your message dated Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:08:58 +0000
with message-id <20021230130858.GC629@polya>
and subject line Bug#173684: you can close the bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2002 14:23:21 +0000
>From rudy@webworm.org Thu Dec 19 08:23:20 2002
Return-path: <rudy@webworm.org>
Received: from horkos.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18P1a4-0008Id-00; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:23:20 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by horkos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id EEF1B855DC
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:23:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from webworm (D5762BBA.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.43.186])
by horkos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B374F855C1
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:23:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rudy by webworm with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18P1c3-000162-00; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:25:23 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rudy Gevaert <rudy@webworm.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin won't install
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:25:23 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E18P1c3-000162-00@webworm>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20021025-6
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux webworm 2.4.19 #7 SMP Wed Oct 16 21:30:34 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debconf 1.2.20 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.0.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg 1.10.9 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-19 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.3.1-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libkpathsea3 1.0.7+20021025-6 shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5-8 PNG library - runtime
ii libwww0 5.4.0-5 The W3C WWW library
ii libxaw7 4.2.1-4 X Athena widget set library
ii perl-tk 1:800.024-1.1 Perl module providing the Tk graph
ii t1lib1 1.3.1-1 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-3 basic teTeX library files
ii xlibs 4.2.1-4 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-8 compression library - runtime
-- debconf information:
* tetex-bin/cnf_name:
* tetex-bin/groupname: rudy
tetex-bin/userperm: false
tetex-bin/groupperm: true
* tetex-bin/lsr-perms: true
Previously my latex broke like mentionned in bug #170963. Except that
it was about elatex, latex, pdflatex, ...
I then waited till bug #170963 got closed and was fixed. What happend
today.
I then removed tetex-bin, and reinstalled it. But tetex-bin wouldn't
even install. It gave a postinstall error.
I then removed tetex-bin and tetex-base, and removed all left over
directories with texmf:
webworm:/# apt-get install tetex-bin
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
tetex-base
The following NEW packages will be installed:
tetex-base tetex-bin
0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 15 not
upgraded.
Need to get 0B/20.7MB of archives. After unpacking 66.3MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-base.
(Reading database ... 88096 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tetex-base (from .../tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-bin.
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_1.0.7+20021025-6_i386.deb) ...
Setting up tetex-base (1.0.2+20021025-3) ...
Setting up tetex-bin (1.0.7+20021025-6) ...
Something seems wrong.
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-bin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
I can't even install tetex now...
Thank you in advance,
Rudy
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 173684-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2002 13:09:05 +0000
>From jdg@polya.uklinux.net Mon Dec 30 07:09:03 2002
Return-path: <jdg@polya.uklinux.net>
Received: from mail2.uklinux.net [80.84.72.32]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18SzfC-0007dK-00; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 07:09:02 -0600
Received: from polya (bts-0198.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.48.198])
by mail2.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196FC409FA6
for <173684-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:09:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18Szf9-0000rw-00; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:08:59 +0000
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:08:58 +0000
From: Julian Gilbey <jdg@polya.uklinux.net>
To: 173684-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#173684: you can close the bug
Message-ID: <20021230130858.GC629@polya>
References: <[🔎] 3E0F212B.2040907@webworm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 3E0F212B.2040907@webworm.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: 173684-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.4 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 05:22:03PM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did as you suggested in your last mail and it fixed all the problems.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Rudy
OK!
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, website: http://www.polya.uklinux.net/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Reply to: