Re: tetex-base: /usr/share/doc/texmf/mkhtml{,.nawk}
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:58:27PM -0700, C.M. Connelly wrote:
> JG> I'm not totally sure why we would have to move them: they
> JG> are private scripts which affect only files in
> JG> /usr/share/doc/texmf and its subdirectories. As long as
> JG> the programs which call these scripts are robust if
> JG> /usr/share/doc/texmf (or even /usr/share/doc) does not
> JG> exist, where is the problem?
>
> Sean Perry seems to believe there's a Policy violation here:
> [...]
> I can't find a specific statement in the Policy Manual that says
> you cannot have executables in /usr/share/doc, although it does
> seem like a sensible thing.
Neither can I. And in this particular case, I don't see where the
problem is, as long as nothing fails if /usr/share/doc doesn't exist.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
website: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-tetex-maint-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: