[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#120960: marked as done (tetex-extra: zero-byte prerm makes package impossible to remove cleanly)



Your message dated Sun, 25 Nov 2001 15:06:58 -0500
with message-id <E1685YI-0006i9-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#120960: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804a-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2001 18:54:54 +0000
>From laptop@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk Sat Nov 24 12:54:54 2001
Return-path: <laptop@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Received: from cicero.e-mis.co.uk [212.240.194.162] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 167hx0-0006DE-00; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 12:54:54 -0600
Received: from plato.systems ([172.21.77.254] ident=mail)
	by cicero.e-mis.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 167hwx-0005VJ-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:54:51 +0000
Received: from laptop by plato.systems with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 167hwx-00032g-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:54:51 +0000
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-extra: zero-byte prerm makes package impossible to remove cleanly
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Date: 24 Nov 2001 18:54:51 +0000
Message-ID: <843d34m22s.fsf@plato.systems>
Lines: 16
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup (laptop) <laptop@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20000804a-1
Severity: serious

| 18:53:12@plato| ~ $ls -l /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.prerm
| -rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root            0 Nov 22 19:17 /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.prerm*

==>

| Removing tetex-extra ...
| dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute pre-removal script: Exec format error
| dpkg: error processing tetex-extra (--purge):
|  subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

-- 
James

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 120960-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2001 20:08:04 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sun Nov 25 14:08:04 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 1685ZM-0002tO-00; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 14:08:04 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 1685YI-0006i9-00; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 15:06:58 -0500
From: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
To: 120960-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.66 $
Subject: Bug#120960: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804a-2
Message-Id: <E1685YI-0006i9-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 15:06:58 -0500
Delivered-To: 120960-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-2.diff.gz
tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-2.dsc
tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-2_all.deb
tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804a-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804a-2_all.deb
tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804a-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804a-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 120960@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 10:43:59 +0100
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-base tetex-doc tetex-extra
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20000804a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Description: 
 tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
 tetex-doc  - teTeX documentation
 tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 120960
Changes: 
 tetex-base (1.0.2+20000804a-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * fix empty tetex-extra.prerm (closes: #120960)
Files: 
 6762aec53f2f9ffe847d7685b87db387 1065 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-2.dsc
 7750d1806cbe3ba145e8f418fbb8c01a 27685 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-2.diff.gz
 d98d26f8159c46d510bc5aa056c6a4f1 13165348 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-2_all.deb
 036ce2c7d96203a8ea21e15e4d38d8f4 9712308 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804a-2_all.deb
 e6499740aa07ff93b131a6447ce96ddd 12381010 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804a-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iQEVAwUBPAEIZW4/9k35XC9tAQE+owf7BzjhZr9TLuKEHzptD1N3NRrEBw2bbrqF
WAJtv5I8+9WzSDb8tbIGitmwkGbD4ql1ItX7e4NCXgyPiNEhNE2M/bd9AxaR5dDp
XN5Ps2Jf3QUQm36wBReBLKXgj4H60BPAe7kCTCh7upvoglrdsOChusInGry0wL9c
YvaCCzV9e3qEKNDrlckmoMZFMT+IWACgkWUQYWCzD/nH8womd2PQh7wrO6EVFBy3
RNIg/ZWun6mDJk0kJCNXzREcApBYyJagmrn/SD1yhsGQEjMXKxJeGysgeVpFTzpI
j1mfmVzB7HYzG/6MOFbfqFwZltwS4nYV/IFU0i32jFzt1/f78rHKHw==
=sVi4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: