Bug#119191: marked as done (tetex-doc: incorrect HTML files)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:49:41 -0500
with message-id <E1670mz-00034X-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#119191: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2001 22:14:54 +0000
>From laurent@smtp.wanadoo.fr Sun Nov 11 16:14:54 2001
Return-path: <laurent@smtp.wanadoo.fr>
Received: from mel-rti20.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.91]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1632sP-0003It-00; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 16:14:54 -0600
Received: from mahonia.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.58) by mel-rti20.wanadoo.fr; 11 Nov 2001 23:14:22 +0100
Received: from localhost (217.128.128.86) by mahonia.wanadoo.fr; 11 Nov 2001 23:14:09 +0100
Received: from laurent by localhost with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 1632rn-0006sW-00; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 23:14:15 +0100
From: Laurent Bonnaud <Laurent.Bonnaud@inpg.fr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-doc: incorrect HTML files
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.35
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.35
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 23:14:14 +0100
Message-Id: <E1632rn-0006sW-00@localhost>
Sender: Laurent Bonnaud <laurent@localhost>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-9
Severity: normal
Hi,
this file is only one byte long:
/usr/share/doc/texmf/help/Catalogue/entries/psnfss.html
whereas all other files in the same directory are correct XML/HTML
files.
Those lack a correct HTML header:
/usr/share/doc/texmf/help/ctan/index.html
/usr/share/doc/texmf/help/faq/index.html
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux jophur 2.4.13-k6 #2 Sun Oct 28 12:00:28 EST 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages tetex-doc depends on:
ii dpkg 1.9.18 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii perl-base [perl5-base] 5.6.1-5 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804-9 basic teTeX library files
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 119191-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2001 20:49:42 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Thu Nov 22 14:49:42 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1670mz-0004M0-00; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:49:41 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1670mz-00034X-00; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:49:41 -0500
From: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
To: 119191-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#119191: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804a-1
Message-Id: <E1670mz-00034X-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:49:41 -0500
Delivered-To: 119191-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-1.diff.gz
tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-1.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-1.dsc
tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-1_all.deb
tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a.orig.tar.gz
tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804a-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804a-1_all.deb
tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804a-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804a-1_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 119191@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:17:40 +0100
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-base tetex-doc tetex-extra
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20000804a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Description:
tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
tetex-doc - teTeX documentation
tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 111284 111289 119191 119531 120300
Changes:
tetex-base (1.0.2+20000804a-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* fix copyrights in gs fonts (closes: #111284, #111289)
* remove predepends on essential package perl(5)-base (closes: #120300)
* add latin9.def and latin10.def (closes: #119531)
* added correct psnfss.html (closes: #119191)
Files:
02a5eca290e7a39708809f1b3534b696 1065 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-1.dsc
b65c2508ccbbf3f99455941722370cad 35110813 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a.orig.tar.gz
cf218df13b170d037d5c5c776a1fc9d3 27963 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-1.diff.gz
96388c6ea44ebd31dd083bfdc1e2b035 13165628 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804a-1_all.deb
7cf95c65db8099235e7e087be9ed49cc 9712134 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804a-1_all.deb
06188acbc94b91104918ed66bc130412 12380996 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804a-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQEVAwUBO/1RBm4/9k35XC9tAQEnNwf8CPxtumN3xMS/ULHqw62vNTadp6O+AaEg
NGiIrAz55bZvcWvx7hGA7jPzGys/VSJV1j+y+sJLbsoIgeciJqA8fWyWGx6BoVj2
tHLlWOwH8uZIJO9I6MGbJGeBuFdfOyZcqUt7xW4qRv/jAjTwj057xIAz2EbSGyuI
XRDJtG+4M38cNVGAXghfPbj1dnFWWmaDzYJ46HV+RkP47V87/SeWuBFuYhd3r9No
KGoA/BubSr+plg1bHZwZ9pqnb6yXWu6GvR0IYHEeM6Wh8Ps4H2zZahOAnbMRRBPH
4QlBNiBvbjwt7ensUSr4q+vg6ONNbTBrJXtMpJHcwM4QvYr0QzzS9Q==
=Sxxa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: