Bug#82388: marked as done (tetex-bin: please upload a new version)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:32:26 +0100
with message-id <20010115153226.A22387@wurtel.net>
and subject line Bug#82388: tetex-bin: please upload a new version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2001 10:16:53 +0000
>From paul@wurtel.net Mon Jan 15 04:16:53 2001
Return-path: <paul@wurtel.net>
Received: from co63281-a.almel1.ov.nl.home.com (gw.wurtel.net) [213.51.148.164]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14I6h0-0005Qd-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 04:16:51 -0600
Received: from wurtel.local ([192.168.1.1] helo=wurtel.net)
by gw.wurtel.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14I6gq-0005Iw-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:16:40 +0100
Received: from paul by wurtel.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14I6gp-0004qz-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:16:39 +0100
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:16:38 +0100
From: Paul Slootman <paul@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-bin: please upload a new version
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20010115111638.A18616@wurtel.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Paul Slootman <paul@wurtel.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20000807-7
Due to some wierd situation that I don't fully understand,
it is not possible to upload 1.0.7+20000807-7 to unstable,
as that gets rejected:
Rejected: tetex-bin_1.0.7+20000807-7_alpha.deb Old version `1.0.7+20000807-7' >= new version `1.0.7+20000807-7'.
However, the version in unstable is actually 1.0.7+20000807-5,
which means that tetex-bin will never promote to testing (as
the version in other architectures are apparently older ?!)
I've discussed this last week with the powers that be, and
it would be looked into "soon". For the time being it's
"easiest" to simply upload a newer version than is currently in
the archives, and then the builds from other architectures can be
accepted into the archive.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 82388-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2001 14:32:50 +0000
>From paul@wurtel.net Mon Jan 15 08:32:48 2001
Return-path: <paul@wurtel.net>
Received: from co63281-a.almel1.ov.nl.home.com (gw.wurtel.net) [213.51.148.164]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14IAge-0002nv-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:32:44 -0600
Received: from wurtel.local ([192.168.1.1] helo=wurtel.net)
by gw.wurtel.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14IAgQ-0005QT-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:32:30 +0100
Received: from paul by wurtel.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14IAgM-0005sY-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:32:26 +0100
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:32:26 +0100
From: Paul Slootman <paul@debian.org>
To: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
Cc: 82388-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#82388: tetex-bin: please upload a new version
Message-ID: <20010115153226.A22387@wurtel.net>
References: <[🔎] 20010115111638.A18616@wurtel.net> <[🔎] 14946.61716.463021.639051@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 14946.61716.463021.639051@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>; from martin@uni-mainz.de on Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:46:12PM +0100
Sender: Paul Slootman <paul@wurtel.net>
Delivered-To: 82388-done@bugs.debian.org
On Mon 15 Jan 2001, Christoph Martin wrote:
> There are uptodate binaries for all architectures including alpha on
> ftp-master now.
Yes, but the problem is that they are not linked to any distribution!
Well, it looks like now they are, but last night they were not.
Now the 1.0.7+20000807-7 version seems to be in each Packages file...
Oh well. I'm now closing this bug, as the problem seems to have solved
itself.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
Reply to: